Engagement overview — Q2 2026
Coverage of GIPF's stakeholder universe against the Strategic Plan 2026–2029. Two high-priority groups need attention before quarter close. Figures are illustrative placeholder data.
June delivered 16 of 22 planned engagements — the widening gap to watch
Planned vs completed, last 6 months. Gold marks the shortfall.
Stakeholders by priority segment
Influence × interest determines engagement intensity.
Recommended actions — continuous improvement
Generated from engagement gaps, lapsed contacts and sentiment shifts.
Influence / interest matrix
Each stakeholder is placed by institutional influence (vertical) and interest in GIPF outcomes (horizontal). The quadrant sets the engagement strategy. Hover a point for detail; click to open the register filtered to that group.
Engagement strategy by quadrant
Principles, frequency and methods aligned to the Strategic Plan 2026–2029.
Methods: Bilateral briefings, board reporting, direct consultation
Methods: Statutory reporting, scheduled briefings, liaison meetings
Methods: Newsletters, town halls, member portal, press releases
Methods: Public campaigns, CSI programmes, periodic outreach
Stakeholder register
Single source of truth for every stakeholder relationship. Search, filter, sort — or click any row to open the full profile. Sorted by influence by default.
| Stakeholder ↕ | Segment ↕ | Influence ↕ | Interest ↕ | Engagement owner ↕ | Last contact ↕ | Sentiment ↕ | Status ↕ |
|---|
Engagement activity tracker
Delivery against the engagement calendar, and the channel mix used to reach stakeholders. The completion gap has widened since April.
Completion slipped to 86% of plan year-to-date
Monthly planned vs completed — use ‹ › to move through the year.
Meetings & forums remain the dominant channel
Share of completed engagements, year-to-date. Sorted by volume.
Positive sentiment has softened 12 points since January
Share of stakeholders by sentiment, monthly.
Recent engagement activity
Latest logged touchpoints across all stakeholders.
Status against plan
RAG health per priority group, scored against a defined threshold — Green ≥85% coverage, Amber 70–84%, Red <70% — plus the next scheduled touchpoints.
RAG thresholds: Green ≥ 85% · Amber 70–84% · Red < 70% coverage of the group's stakeholders engaged within 60 days.
Upcoming engagements
Next scheduled touchpoints across all groups.